We’s Be Victims…

It’s the BLACK lie and the denial that keeps the hostilities so high…

No one in any of today’s Blacks living family has ever been a slave or even experienced strife and oppression. Blacks have lived in a POST-racial society where all of us Blacks have had the SAME opportunities as all other races in this nation and the only differences now in Blacks’ successes or failures are ONLY attributable to to whether Blacks themselves availed themselves of those opportunities. We have ONLY ourselves to blame in these POST-racial days. We can always go back to Africa if we’re not happy here.

Whites simply don’t care anymore (and rightly so) in light of the recent research findings that prove that Blacks are more to blame for their historical plight than reported and that Whites are far more responsible for any freedoms that the Blacks enjoy to this day than any Black individual….especially those thrown up by Blacks from the very small and insignificant 10 or so years of this so called snivel rights movement.

Blacks attempt to balance all blame on this exceedingly small time period because that is all they have to draw from but there is vastly far more to Black history than just the snivel rights. Blacks unethically try to cause us to forget;

☠ That it was Blacks (African Kings and Rulers) that created slavery in collusion and FULL COOPERATION with the Arabs in the first place @680 AD and STILL practice slavery today.

☠ That it was a BLACK man (Anthony Johnson) that CREATED the “Roots” style abusive slavery by challenging indentured servant John Casor in a Virginia Court for his freedom and making John Casor the very first SLAVE in the colonies in the first place. Anthony Johnson< A BLACK MAN, went into court and DEMANDED IT!

☠ In 1860 only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the U.S. census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slave holding states. The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves. Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves). In the rare instances when the ownership of slaves by free Negroes is acknowledged in the history books, justification centers on the claim that black slave masters were simply individuals who purchased the freedom of a spouse or child from a white slaveholder and had been unable to legally manumit them. Although this did indeed happen at times, it is a misrepresentation of the majority of instances, one which is debunked by records of the period on blacks who owned slaves. These include individuals such as Justus Angel and Mistress L. Horry, of Colleton District, South Carolina, who each owned 84 slaves in 1830. In fact, in 1830 a fourth of the free Negro slave masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more slaves; eight owning 30 or more.

☠ According to federal census reports, on June 1, 1860 there were nearly 4.5 million Negroes in the United States, with fewer than four million of them living in the southern slave holding states. Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. The country’s leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city. To return to the census figures quoted above, this 28 percent is certainly impressive when compared to less than 1.4 percent of all American whites and less than 4.8 percent of southern whites. The statistics show that, when free, blacks disproportionately became slave masters.

☠ That the largest Black slaveholder in the South, John Carruthers Stanly of North Carolina, faced a number of problems in the 1820s in dealing with a slave labor force on his three turpentine plantations in Craven County. With a total of 163 slaves, Stanly was a harsh, profit-minded taskmaster whose treatment of his slaves was no different than the treatment slaves received from white owners, and his field hands would run away. Stanly’s goal, shared by white southern planters, was on expanding his operations and increasing his profits. Stanley dealt with this through his two white overseers and with a spy network that included a few trusted slaves. Brister, his slave barber in New Bern, was responsible for relaying to his owner rumors of planned escapes …Nor did Stanly have any pangs of conscience about selling children away from their parents or holding free blacks in bondage.” Yes folks, Black on Black predation…just like today.

☠ Add further that in 1830 there were MORE BLACK SLAVE OWNERS THAN WHITE SLAVE OWNERS in South Carolina and very few whites practiced slavery: in 1860 there were 385,000 USA citizens who owned slaves, or about 1.4% of the white population (there were 27 million whites in the USA). That percentage was zero in the states that did not allow slavery (only 8 million of the 27 million whites lived in states that allowed slavery). Incidentally, in 1830 about 25% of the free Negro slave masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more slaves: that is a much higher percentage (ten times more) than the number of white slave owners. Thus slave owners were a tiny minority (1.4%) and it was not only whites: it was just about anybody who could, INCLUDING BLACKS THEMSELVES.

☠ Finally, add the FACT that since slave owners comprised only 1.4% of the total population that the MAJORITY (98%) of the population were ABOLITIONISTS and that the MAJORITY OF WHITES TODAY (98%) are descendants of those abolitionists and thus owe Blacks nothing. In fact it is the Blacks that owe WHITES for their freedom.

So tell me ….where are Black’s admiration and thanks to the predominately WHITE ABOLITIONISTS whom without even their much touted snivel rights wouldn’t have even been possible?

NLD [Narcissistic Liberal Disorder]

Like you I had a hard time understanding the destructive decisions and musings of the average liberal socialist. It just didn’t seem to make sense to me. I couldn’t wrap my mind around their stances and positions in life. They did truly seem to be disjointed and confusing bereft of logic and common sense. After years of searching I finally discovered the answer, NLD (Narcissistic Liberal Disorder). Yes….it is the correct answer because it’s true that the simplest answer is best. Diagnostic parsimony advocates that when diagnosing a given injury, ailment, illness, or disease a doctor should strive to look for the fewest possible causes that will account for all the symptoms. This philosophy is one of several demonstrated in the popular medical adage “when you hear hoof beats behind you, think horses, not zebras”.

I make no attack on personage, but quite appropriately offer the only possible answer that fits the parameters of the problem of liberals’, Democrats’, wildly erratic, confused, disjointed and disturbingly deranged thought processes that are so very dangerous to the United States’ continued existence for it is all too apparent to the rest of “We the People” that the answers lie in Doctor’s Lyle Rossiter’s, Gary R. Casselman’s, Timothy Daughtry’s and Alan Bates’ peer accepted and validated psychological findings;

Liberalism often exhibits the classic symptoms of Munchausen Syndrome, a mental disorder whereby caretakers further enfeeble the chronically enfeebled as a means to power and privilege. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) describes Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA) as a psychiatric disorder most common among mothers who intentionally harm or describe nonexistent symptoms in their children to get the attention given to the family of someone who is sick. The disorder was formerly known as Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSbP/MSP). FDIA is considered a form of abuse by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. However, cases have been reported of adult victims, especially the disabled or elderly. The common symptoms of FDIA: the person is often a parent, but may be an adult child, spouse, or caretaker of a disabled adult; appears quite concerned (some would say overly concerned) about the designated patient; is very friendly and cooperative with health care providers. This description fits the Liberals and Democrat Party like a made-to-order suit. ~Gerald K. McOscar

In the case of a political liberal it is the Munchausen Syndrome stricken political liberal who views themselves in the position of a “parent” of society as a whole and the political liberal constantly produces a stream of nonexistent symptoms [racism, sexism, global warming, diversity, ad nauseam] in their perceived children [all of society] simply to get the attention, power, privilege and money.

“So extravagant are the patterns of thinking, emoting, behaving and relating that characterize the liberal mind that its relentless protests and demands become understandable only as disorders of the psyche.” The Liberal Mind reveals the madness of the modern liberal for what it is: a massive transference neurosis acted out in the world’s political arenas, with devastating effects on the institutions of liberty. ~ Dr. Lyle Rossiter, Jr., M.D., University of Of Chicago Div Of Bio Sci Pritzker Sch Of Med: Graduated in 1962: Psychiatry – Board Certified, Forensic Psychiatry – Board Certified.

The root of liberal mental disorder is in the personality development of the individual who does not mature normally to value self sufficiency and independence. Such individuals seek a parental substitute. The most convenient is a socialist government. Those with liberal mental disorder are willing to trade their potential for success through education, hard work and respect for others for government subsidies funded through redistribution of wealth which normally accrues to those who earn their money through hard work. Most liberals are intolerant and immature just as are spoiled children. In fact they are the adult version of spoiled children complete with certain sociopathic traits such as pathologic lying and distortion of facts in order to achieve their goals. Liberals mental disorder is characterized by narcissism, selective memory, irrational approaches to problems and denial of reality. ~Dr. Alan Bates, MD: Healthgrades Honor Roll; Family Practice – Board Certified; Central Washington University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City.

Liberals comprise only about 20 percent of the voting public. So, how has the left been so successful in swaying the majority of voters to believe what they feed them, when most often what the left says is not supported by the facts and what they do actually does harm to their voting constituents? How do they do this? They lie. The uninformed voter will not take the time to learn the facts. ~Dr. Gary R. Casselman, CEO of CCG, Inc., PhD. in Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania.

The dirty little secret is that the left recognizes, at least de facto, if not deliberately, [is] that the human mind is both logical (the left hemisphere of the neo cortex) and emotional (the limbic system). We are all pretty familiar with the linear logic of the left hemisphere of the human brain, but most of us are unfamiliar with the most powerful part of the brain – the limbic system. [The Psychology Behind Leftist Lies] It is the limbic system that has been the foundation of our survival as a species since time began. It is the center of the survival emotions, most powerfully of which are fear and anger: the flight and fight emotions. These powerful survival emotions get triggered whenever the brain senses a threat to its survival, setting up a series of responses and reactions in the brain and in the body to prepare to run away from the threat, or fight it if escape is impossible. The left uses this knowledge about how our brains work to garner massive support for their big government policy by painting a picture of Republicans as a threat. ~Timothy Daughtry, Ph.D., President of CCG, clinical psychologist with 25 years of organizational experience University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, M.A. and Ph.D. 1978, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

With regard to the existence of NLD (Narcissistic Liberal Disorder)….note that liberals fail to provide anything to refute it except emotionally laden whines devoid of any contradictory facts from NEUTRAL parties while I provide valid citations of scientific findings of which peer reviews not only validated the findings but additionally confirmed that Doctor Lyle Rossiter had, and this is very important, ABSOLUTELY NO ASSOCIATIONS, past or present, with any political entities whatsoever. And any argument that the disorder is not in the DSM carries no weight in that the DSM [ DSM-I (1952), DSM-II (1968), DSM-III (1980), DSM-III-R (1987), DSM-IV (1994), DSM-IV-TR (2000), DSM-5 (2013)], as one can see is extremely slow in providing updates and thus chronically outdated just as it is regarding NLD, a validated mental disease.

Kings and Queens

If you know your history then you are WELL AWARE that slavery was STARTED by African kings, queens and leaders in FULL COOPERATION @680 AD with the Arabs and that they traded their very own Black slave brethren to the Arabs for jewels, carpets, statues and other trinkets.

Also, African kings or queens did NOT allow captured enemy kings or queens to live out of fear that they would cause insurrections and resistance among the others they had captured. For this reason any kings, queens or others in a high leadership role  were quickly EXECUTED to make the remainder of the captured tribe demoralized and pliable.

This means that ALL Black Americans today CAN NOT be a descendant of any “king” or “queen” because any king or queen stayed in Africa with their jewels, carpets, statues and other trinkets they traded YOUR slave ancestors for or were killed.

Black Americans  simply have no blood of the kings or queens coursing through their veins. They are nothing more than the progeny of a lowly slave who was of even less importance than the carpet bought with their ancestors and walked all over.

Taxpayer Funded Welfare Handouts

“I want people to be able to get what they need to live: enough food, a place to live, and an education for their children. Government does not provide these as well as private charities and businesses”. Colonel David Crockett, member of Congress 1827-32, 1832-35, said it well:

“We have rights, as individuals, to give as much of our own money as we please to charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of public money.”

The word 'racism' is like ketchup. It can be put on practically anything – and demanding evidence makes you a 'racist.' ~Thomas Sowell